Search for: "Mark D. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2009, 11:43 am
Mark Thoma showcases a useful Amatrya Sen piece on the caricaturing of Adam Smith. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:22 am
. -- Trademark lawyers for XP Innovation, LLC d/b/a Dan's Comp ("Dan's Comp") of Mt. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 4:58 pm
The trial court denied a motion for preliminary injunction against Smith, holding that the way in which he'd used the mark was merely for news reporting and commentary, and thus not actionable under trademark law. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:23 am
It has been said that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Marc Short, Vice President Pence’s former Chief-of-Staff, told the House Committee why he discounted some of the things Meadows said: “I’d been told a lot of different things from Mark Meadows, who had told a lot of different things to a lot of different people. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 8:01 am
§ 1052(d)). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:10 am
Posted by D. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:10 am
Posted by D. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 2:14 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the mark PACIFIC VIEW VINEYARDS for wine [VINEYARDS disclaimed], in view of the registered mark PACIFIC VISTA for wine].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: How did you do? [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:44 am
Senator Tina Smith (D-MN) introduced a companion bill in the Senate. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 5:13 pm
"The Board therefore unsurprisingly affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
And, as pointed out by Examining Attorney D. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Smith needed to take a few of Grandma’s pills before being deposed. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
" Appellant David Copeland-Smith challenged the Board's findings with respect to the first and sixth du Pont factors - the similarity of the marks and the strength of the cited mark - but the court found that substantial evidence supported the Board's factual findings and it concluded that the Board had properly affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal to register. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:38 am
Smith. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) did mention the markup could come as soon as mid to late April. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
”[6] Amongst the works published, one photograph, titled Tomoko and Mother in the Bath (1971), particularly left a mark in the history of photography and photojournalism.[7] The photograph portrays Tomoko, who was affected by the mercury poisoning leaking from the Chisso factory since birth, being bathed by her mother Ryoko.[8] The Smiths positioned Tomoko and Mother in the Bath on the last page of the photo essay. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
Third-party registration evidence once again proved fatal to an applicant seeking to overcome a Section 2(d) refusal. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:30 pm
Dems: Jack Reed (D-RI) Max Baucus (D-MT) Tom Harkin (D-IA) Carl Levin (D-MI) Tim Johnson (D-SD) John Kerry (D-MA) Mark Pryor (D-AR) Richard Durbin (D-IL) Mary Landrieu (D-LA) Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) Joe Biden (D-DE) John Rockefeller (D-WV) Republicans: Lamar Alexander (R-TN) Wayne Allart (R-CO) Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) Thad Cochran (R-MS) Norm Coleman (R-MN) Susan Collins (R-ME) John… [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:23 am
I once heard a TTAB judge tell an audience that the outcome of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases may be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. [read post]
